Baseball's Maple Bat Controversy - Does Someone Have to Die?

Matthew Leeth
Contributor
Visit Matthew Leeth on FacebookVisit Matthew Leeth on LinkedInVisit Matthew Leeth on Twitter
Posted by Matthew LeethJuly 21, 2009 3:18 PM

Maples bats are a clearly dangerous hazard that MLB will continue to ignore until someone is killed or seriously injured. Strong language, I know, but MLB’s actions thus far can only be summarized as a grossly negligent policy only lacking a significant injury.

First, some history. MLB bats were historically made out of ash wood. Maple bats were officially sanctioned in 1997, but it was Barry Bonds hitting 73 home-runs with a maple bat in 2001 which put it on the map. From there on, most players were convinced that maple bats provide greater hitting power. In 2005, MLB had a man named Jim Sherwood test this theory. Mr. Sherwood reported that there was no advantage to using maple bats.

Undeterred, maple bats have become increasingly popular and are the bat of choice with almost every major league player. Baseball players are often described as a superstitious bunch, and while there is no actual benefit to maple bats, players often report that it just “feels” harder.

Even with no real benefit (I’m not sure if I’ve stressed that enough); there is a significantly dangerous drawback. While ash bats crack when broken, maple bats will either splinter or shatter into pieces. Sometimes a shard breaks off at the barrel, sending it flying into the stands. Sometimes, it breaks at the handle.

The MLB says they are “looking into it.” Yeah, right. The reality is that the players union has a negotiated agreement with the MLB as to the composition of their bats. And since players are convinced the maple bats will give them a competitive edge, they (as a whole) demand it. MLB PR seems to stall the media by saying they are investigating, but really they appear to just be avoiding the situation. But they won’t be able to avoid explaining to a victim’s family that an unproven alternative to ash was more important than fan safety.

Words can only say so much, though. Here’s more than enough proof that it’s time for the MLB to make the right decision by banning maple bats.

Here's Nick Green almost getting impaled at the short stop (sorry, can’t embed this). Nick Green said after the game “I don’t use maple… they say they’ve fixed it or whatever but that obviously didn’t fix [it]”)

AlfonsoSorianoBreaksBat080608.jpgMapleBat.jpgMapleBat5.jpg

MapleBat2.jpg

And there are thousands of more of these images on the net. But rather than create a 15 page blog post filled with pictures, I suggest those interested read into this issue some more. This probably isn't the first time you've heard about maple bat controversy, especially if you follow baseball. But I can garauntee you it won't be your last time, either.

Thanks to Billy @ Clubhouse Cancer for compiling the pictures.

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Mike BryantInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
July 22, 2009 8:31 AM

I remember when soon to be HOF Jim Rice had his bat split and it hit a little kid in the left side little section that juts out at Fenway. With this maple hazard, seems like it really doesn't make sense. Interesting article.

Matthew LeethInjuryBoard Contributor
Posted by Matthew Leeth
July 22, 2009 2:30 PM

Thanks for the comment Mike. Some people believe that the exploding bats are just "part of the game," like a foul ball. That's hogwash though.

At the other extreme, more and more analysts agree they should give up wood bats all together and adopt comparable aluminum bats. I'm not sure if that's the right thing to do, but it's something to consider.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Tampa Bay

InjuryBoard Tampa Bay RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Tampa Bay is brought to you by Alley, Clark & Greiwe and Saunders and Walker

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Alley, Clark & Greiwe (866) 735-1102 Ext 450 www.tampatriallawyers.com
google
  • C. Todd Alley
    C. Todd Alley
    (866) 735-1102 Ext 450
  • Jim Clark
    Jim Clark
    (866) 735-1102 Ext 451 Email Jim
  • Don Greiwe
    Don Greiwe
    (866) 735-1102 Ext 452 Email Don
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Largo, Palm Harbor, Pinellas Park, Tarpon Springs, Brandon, Brooksville, New Port Richey, Bradenton, Sarasota and all surrounding areas
701 E. Washington Street, Tampa, Florida 33602 [ Show Map ]
Saunders and Walker (866) 735-1102 Ext 340 www.saunderslawyers.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: St. Petersburg, Tampa, Sarasota, Bradenton, Manatee, Largo, Palm Harbor, Pinellas Park, Tarpon Springs, Clearwater, Palmetto, Ellenton, Lakewood Ranch, Cortez, Anna Maria, Holmes Beach, Longboat Key
3491 Gandy BlvdSuite 200, Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 [ Show Map ]1001 3rd Ave W, Bradenton, Florida 34205 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address